Commercial Charging · Market comparison

EV charging access in the 10 biggest EV markets

Ten metro areas scored on public chargers per new EV, fast-charging coverage, EV adoption and utility programs, with the weights, data and limits shown.

Drive Economics has no affiliation with, sponsorship from, or endorsement by any charging network, automaker, utility, city or program named here.

#1San Francisco Bay Area
45.4 / 50top score
×2weight on ports per EV
10markets compared

The short answer

  • The San Francisco Bay Area ranks first among the 10 markets with the most new EV registrations, scoring 45.4 of 50. It leads on fast-charging coverage, EV adoption and utility programs. San Diego (36.6) and Denver (35.8) follow.
  • Chargers per EV carries double weight, as the measure that most directly shows whether public charging keeps up with demand. On that measure Denver (268 public ports per 1,000 new EVs) and San Diego (262) lead, and Miami (112) trails.
  • Dallas–Fort Worth ranks last (9.3), low on every measure, including utility programs: its wires utility, Oncor, lists one EV-related incentive type in the federal database.
  • Any ranking depends on its weights. With equal weights, the top five stay the same and only the middle reorders. Each measure is shown on its own below, and permitting speed is left out because no consistent data exists across these cities.
10largest EV markets, by new registrations
104,524public charging ports in these markets
×2weight on public ports per new EV
1–10score per measure

Overall ranking

EV charging access score, top 10 EV markets

Each measure scored 1 to 10 across the 10 markets; public ports per new EV counts twice. Maximum 50.

Swipe to see the full chart →

Public ports per new EV (×2)Fast-charging coverageEV adoptionUtility programs010203040501. San Francisco Bay Areaequal weights: #145.42. San Diegoequal weights: #236.63. Denverequal weights: #335.84. Los Angelesequal weights: #431.35. Seattleequal weights: #530.36. New Yorkequal weights: #727.27. Atlantaequal weights: #825.18. Chicagoequal weights: #624.19. Miamiequal weights: #914.310. Dallas–Fort Worthequal weights: #109.3
Scores are relative to these 10 markets: 10 is the best of the group and 1 the lowest, not an absolute grade. The label under each name shows the rank with all four measures weighted equally.

The four measures

×2 weight

Public ports per new EV

Public Level 2 and DC fast ports per 1,000 new EVs registered in the past 12 months. Shows whether public charging is keeping pace with new EVs.

×1 weight

Fast-charging coverage

Public DC fast ports per 100,000 residents. Shows how available quick charging is for residents, visitors and drivers without home charging.

×1 weight

EV adoption

New EVs registered per 1,000 residents over 12 months. A larger EV base supports charging business and more utility attention.

×1 weight

Utility programs

EV-related incentive types listed by the main local utilities in the federal Alternative Fuels Data Center: EV rates, charger and make-ready rebates, managed charging and vehicle offers.

Public ports per new EV

Public charging ports per 1,000 new EVs registered

Level 2 and DC fast ports, divided by new retail EV registrations over 12 months.

Swipe to see the full chart →

050100150200250300Denver6,437 ports · 24k+ new EVs268San Diego6,547 ports · 25k+ new EVs262New York16,361 ports · 64k+ new EVs256Atlanta5,840 ports · 24k+ new EVs243San Francisco Bay Area18,074 ports · 79k+ new EVs229Los Angeles31,372 ports · 143k+ new EVs219Seattle6,878 ports · 32k+ new EVs215Chicago4,753 ports · 24k+ new EVs198Dallas–Fort Worth4,105 ports · 30k+ new EVs137Miami4,157 ports · 37k+ new EVs112
Ports: AFDC station data, October 25, 2026. New EVs: Experian, 12 months to Q2 2026.

A low figure can mean public charging lags demand, as in Miami, or that most EVs charge at home. A high figure in a market with fewer EVs, such as Denver, may reflect early building ahead of demand.

Busy chargers tell the same story from the other side: Paren reported Q3 2026 fast-charger utilization of 31.8% in Los Angeles, 28.4% in Miami and 27.8% in San Diego, against 15.9% nationally (Paren). Utilization is not scored here because it is not published for all 10 markets.

Fast-charging coverage

Public DC fast ports per 100,000 residents

Includes Tesla Superchargers, which many non-Tesla EVs can use with a NACS port or an adapter.

Swipe to see the full chart →

010203040506070San Francisco Bay Area4,607 DC ports · Tesla 2,70460San Diego1,716 DC ports · Tesla 92952Los Angeles7,525 DC ports · Tesla 4,67341Seattle1,708 DC ports · Tesla 79930Denver1,267 DC ports · Tesla 47329Chicago2,169 DC ports · Tesla 75622Miami1,065 DC ports · Tesla 74122Atlanta1,522 DC ports · Tesla 82920Dallas–Fort Worth1,716 DC ports · Tesla 82119New York3,404 DC ports · Tesla 1,92715
Ports: AFDC, October 25, 2026. Population: U.S. Census Bureau county estimates, July 2025.

EV adoption

New EVs registered per 1,000 residents, 12 months

Retail EV registrations only; fleet and lease registrations may be counted differently.

Swipe to see the full chart →

0.02.04.06.08.010.012.0San Francisco Bay Area10.4Los Angeles7.8San Diego7.6Miami7.6Seattle5.7Denver5.4Dallas–Fort Worth3.2Atlanta3.1New York2.9Chicago2.5
Registrations: Experian. Population: U.S. Census Bureau, July 2025.

Experian also publishes total new retail registrations for six of these markets, which gives EV share of new sales: about 31% in the Bay Area, 19% in Los Angeles, 11% in Miami, 8% in Dallas–Fort Worth, 8% in New York and 8% in Chicago, against 8.2% nationally (Experian). Because it is not published for all 10, sales share is shown here but not scored.

Utility programs

EV-related incentive types listed by the main local utilities

Count of residential and non-residential EV incentive types in AFDC; averaged where two utilities are used.

Swipe to see the full chart →

0246810San Francisco Bay AreaPG&E9ChicagoComEd8DenverXcel Energy7SeattleSeattle City Light7New YorkCon Edison + PSE&G5.5AtlantaGeorgia Power4Los AngelesLADWP + SCE3.5MiamiFPL3San DiegoSDG&E2Dallas–Fort WorthOncor1
Source: AFDC utility incentive listings, checked October 25, 2026. Natural gas fuel discounts excluded.
San Francisco Bay Area · score 10.0

PG&E (9): Residential: EV Time-of-Use (TOU) Rate; EV Level 2 Charging Station Purchase Rebate; Pre-Owned EV Rebate. Business: EV Time-of-Use (TOU) Rate; EV Level 2 Charging Station Purchase Rebate; EV Direct Current (DC) Fast Charging Station Purchase Rebate; EV Charger Deployment Pilot Programs; New EV Rebate; Off-Road EV Equipment Rebates. AFDC listing

Chicago · score 8.9

ComEd (8): Residential: EV Level 2 Charging Station Purchase Rebate; EV Level 2 Charging Station Installation Rebate. Business: EV Level 2 Charging Station Purchase Rebate; EV Direct Current (DC) Fast Charging Station Purchase Rebate; EV Level 2 Charging Station Installation Rebate; EV Direct Current (DC) Fast Charging Station Installation Rebate; Make-Ready or Pre-Wiring Rebate for EV Chargers; New EV Rebate. AFDC listing

Denver · score 7.8

Xcel Energy (7): Residential: EV Time-of-Use (TOU) Rate; EV Level 2 Charging Station Purchase Rebate; Make-Ready or Pre-Wiring Rebate for EV Chargers; EV Charger Deployment Pilot Programs; New EV Rebate; Pre-Owned EV Rebate. Business: EV Time-of-Use (TOU) Rate. AFDC listing

Seattle · score 7.8

Seattle City Light (7): Residential: EV Level 2 Charging Station Purchase Rebate. Business: EV Level 2 Charging Station Purchase Rebate; EV Direct Current (DC) Fast Charging Station Purchase Rebate; EV Level 2 Charging Station Installation Rebate; EV Direct Current (DC) Fast Charging Station Installation Rebate; Make-Ready or Pre-Wiring Rebate for EV Chargers; Fleet Electrification Assessment. AFDC listing

New York · score 6.1

Con Edison (4): Residential: EV Time-of-Use (TOU) Rate; EV Managed Charging Program. Business: Make-Ready or Pre-Wiring Rebate for EV Chargers; EV Charger Deployment Pilot Programs. AFDC listing

PSE&G (7): Residential: EV Time-of-Use (TOU) Rate; EV Level 2 Charging Station Installation Rebate; Make-Ready or Pre-Wiring Rebate for EV Chargers. Business: EV Time-of-Use (TOU) Rate; EV Level 2 Charging Station Installation Rebate; EV Direct Current (DC) Fast Charging Station Installation Rebate; Make-Ready or Pre-Wiring Rebate for EV Chargers. AFDC listing

Atlanta · score 4.4

Georgia Power (4): Residential: EV Time-of-Use (TOU) Rate; EV Level 2 Charging Station Purchase Rebate. Business: EV Level 2 Charging Station Purchase Rebate; Make-Ready or Pre-Wiring Rebate for EV Chargers. AFDC listing

Los Angeles · score 3.8

LADWP (4): Residential: EV Level 2 Charging Station Purchase Rebate; Pre-Owned EV Rebate. Business: EV Level 2 Charging Station Purchase Rebate; EV Direct Current (DC) Fast Charging Station Purchase Rebate. AFDC listing

SCE (3): Residential: EV Time-of-Use (TOU) Rate; Make-Ready or Pre-Wiring Rebate for EV Chargers; Pre-Owned EV Rebate. Business: none listed. AFDC listing

Miami · score 3.2

FPL (3): Residential: EV Charger Deployment Pilot Programs. Business: EV Charger Deployment Pilot Programs; Fleet Electrification Assessment. AFDC listing

San Diego · score 2.1

SDG&E (2): Residential: EV Time-of-Use (TOU) Rate; Pre-Owned EV Rebate. Business: none listed. AFDC listing

Dallas–Fort Worth · score 1.0

Oncor (1): Residential: none listed. Business: Fleet Electrification Assessment. AFDC listing

AFDC’s listings are a consistent national inventory, but they can lag program changes and omit some tariffs. For example, Southern California Edison offers separately metered business EV rates (TOU-EV-7, 8 and 9) and San Diego Gas & Electric offers its subscription-based EV-HP rate, neither of which AFDC lists as a business incentive (SCE, SDG&E). That lowers Los Angeles and San Diego on this measure; counting them would add one program type to each utility and would not change the top three.

What is not scored

Not scored

Permitting speed

No dataset compares charger permitting times across these cities on the same basis. Some cities publish targets or online permitting, but timelines depend on the project, the utility interconnection queue and local review.

Not scored

Reliability and utilization

Paren publishes these for some metros and states, not for all 10 markets on the same basis.

Not scored

Price per kWh

Public charging prices vary by site and hour within each metro more than between metros.

What it means

Drivers

Home charging still decides cost

Public access matters most for drivers without a home charger. In low-scoring markets, check fast-charging options near home and work before buying.

Site hosts and operators

Where demand outruns ports

Few ports per new EV plus high utilization, as in Miami and Los Angeles, point to unmet demand. Utility programs and demand charges still decide site returns.

Utilities and cities

The gaps are fixable

Make-ready programs, commercial EV rates and faster permitting are the levers a city or utility controls directly.

About this ranking

Markets. The 10 TV market areas (Nielsen designated market areas, or DMAs) with the most new retail EV registrations in the 12 months to Q2 2026, from Experian. Experian reports registrations rounded down to the nearest thousand (for example, “143K+”); we use the rounded figures. Registrations are new vehicles, not all EVs on the road.

Geography. DMA borders are proprietary, so each market is approximated with its core counties (for example, the five-county Los Angeles area and the New York market’s counties in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Pennsylvania). Charging sites are assigned to counties by ZIP code using the Census ZIP-to-county relationship file; population is Census county estimates for July 2025.

Ports. Open public stations in AFDC station data downloaded October 25, 2026, counting Level 2 and DC fast ports; Level 1 and private chargers are excluded.

Scoring. Each measure is scaled from 1 (lowest of the 10) to 10 (highest), then summed, with public ports per new EV counted twice. Because the scale is relative, a market can score 1 and still have thousands of chargers.

Utilities. Main utilities: Los Angeles (LADWP and SCE), Bay Area (PG&E), New York (Con Edison and PSE&G), Miami (FPL), Seattle (Seattle City Light), Dallas–Fort Worth (Oncor), San Diego (SDG&E), Denver (Xcel Energy), Chicago (ComEd), Atlanta (Georgia Power). Other utilities serve parts of each market. In Texas’s competitive market, retail electricity providers, not Oncor, offer EV rate plans.

Drive Economics has no affiliation with, sponsorship from, or endorsement by any charging network, automaker, utility, city or program named here.